Graal Forums

Graal Forums (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/index.php)
-   Your opinion (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=195)
-   -   99-05 graal rocked and 06-10 graal should be improved (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=134259702)

Hiro 07-01-2010 06:52 PM

99-05 graal rocked and 06-10 graal should be improved
 
this is my opinion, and i don't give a flying **** about graal before 1999 because i didn't play. 2005 was a sort of toss up because it sort of sucked, but it wasn't as terrible as things are now. 2000-2003 was the best that graal has ever been

cbk1994 07-01-2010 06:53 PM

holy ****, you're a genius

knightfire35 07-01-2010 06:57 PM

I wouldn't say 06-10 sucks by any means, but it's no where near how it used to be.

kia345 07-01-2010 07:58 PM

Guys, the economy is bad. Let's make it better!

Shards-Of-Fate 07-01-2010 08:03 PM

Okay. What Graal needs to do is to catch up with the times. 2D is not dead. I.e. iPhone and DSi. Graal Online is the business name and should be the name of a launcher, yes. Graal Online Launcher ( GO Launcher :D ). And each "playerworld" should be considered its own game. Accounts should be caught up with the times as well. You should be paying for specific games, or rather access to them. So that servers that strive to be different from classic can also be considered their own game. I mean, Gscript is an engine and Graal is just a loader.

Graal hasn't evolved with the times.

Thats my opinion at least.
tldr; I agree with OP.

Crono 07-01-2010 08:19 PM

05 did not rock and 04 barely "rocked"

Chakrah 07-01-2010 09:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hiro (Post 1585296)
this is my opinion, and i don't give a flying **** about graal before 1999 because i didn't play. 2005 was a sort of toss up because it sort of sucked, but it wasn't as terrible as things are now. 2000-2003 was the best that graal has ever been

this.

and @Shards

you're not the same blu murasake i knew way back when are you

Shards-Of-Fate 07-01-2010 09:28 PM

Nope.

Hiro 07-01-2010 10:15 PM

for the record, i did not say "should be improved" i said "sucks"

Precise 07-01-2010 10:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by knightfire35 (Post 1585298)
I wouldn't say 06-10 sucks by any means, but it's no where near how it used to be.

You're mistaken. Also, you evidently did NOT play prior to 03/04 if you're saying such.

Graal now sucks.

qw3rt 07-01-2010 10:38 PM

I'm not sure people on Classic Iphone will share your opinion lol.
We're almost 800-1300 online everyday, good ambiance etc...
it rocks.

Precise 07-01-2010 10:41 PM

Obviously... You're on a platform that cannot potentially play anything better than Graal ATM.

Graal is a hit on the iPhone because there's nothing like it *yet*.

knightfire35 07-01-2010 11:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Precise (Post 1585342)
You're mistaken. Also, you evidently did NOT play prior to 03/04 if you're saying such.

Graal now sucks.

You're right, I started in 2004. I know that Graal was way better back then, but that doesn't mean I hate Graal now.

fowlplay4 07-01-2010 11:11 PM

Posting in a thread about how Graal was a decade ago.

Precise 07-01-2010 11:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by knightfire35 (Post 1585359)
but that doesn't mean I hate Graal now.

You're missing the point of this thread. We do not "hate" graal, either. At least I don't, as I can only speak for myself. We're merely contrasting how it used to be back then compared to now.


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 01:59 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright (C) 1998-2019 Toonslab All Rights Reserved.