![]() |
Ingame Playerlist
How do I get rid of this blue ingame playerlist?
|
F7
Options Uncheck "Use in-game playerlist" Don't even know why Stefan added it, its awful. |
Quote:
|
I use the in-game player list, I like it way more than the other one.
|
Quote:
|
Did that buggy docked playerlist ever get fixed?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I think it's great that CJ offers support for Windows, Mac OS X and Linux. It's a step towards the future, more companies are doing this every year. Id software has been doing this since the beginning.
Just because you're stuck with Mac or just doesn't want to use Windows doesn't mean that you don't want to play games. CJ decided to make it easy for themselves by making the in-game playerlist, yes it sucks and Mac/Linux should be able to use an external one too. But the in-game one will do fine until then. (I know it will never happen.) Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
The in-game playerlist is not that bad when it's external, but its still very crappy in the version I have (right click doesn't work; middle click does?), hovering mouse over doesn't work unless you click inside, moving your mouse outside always brings up the tool tip, names don't refresh unless you put your mouse over it. However, I was told Stefan fixed these in the next version :)
Would also be nice if it could dock like on the Windows external playerlist. The reason there are so few Mac users is because the current client sucks on Intel Macs, which almost every Mac user has. The new client will help a lot, assuming CJ can get the publicity/advertising. The reason for so few Linux users is because virtually no gamers play Linux :p |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
External Playerlist should be updated also, I don't see why the ingame one got a mass message option while the external doesnt :( I hate shift+scrolling all the list everytime I wanna send a mass.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Ctrl + A tbh.
|
There's no point in crippling an already working Windows version in the name of platform compatibility. I've briefly used the version with external PM windows (yeah it's pretty sad we have to wait for something that was working fine years ago) and it's still not the same.
Even then, why does the Windows version have to have the far inferior in-game playerlist enabled by default? |
eeh, didnt know that :noob:
|
Quote:
In my opinion Graal v2.31 was the far best version ever. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Probably about the same.
|
Quote:
|
v3 had a pretty classic kind of serverlist right? That was actually one good thing about it. :P
|
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
I have more somewhere but I can't find 'em. |
I don't think I ever got v3 working properly for me. Either way, I was mostly gone around that time.
|
Quote:
And I think you can still can connect with the Graal v3 client to the serverlist although you get "You need to upgrade to v5.12 to play on this server" |
Quote:
There are still tons of things that make v5 the best version so far. There were massive speed improvements on most servers for the Mac client (before Universal, when the Mac version began to run the same or better than Windows). There were scripting language improvements. Bug fixes. And many more things I can't think of. Quote:
|
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT +2. The time now is 02:23 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright (C) 1998-2019 Toonslab All Rights Reserved.