Graal Forums

Graal Forums (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/index.php)
-   PlayerWorlds Main Forum (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=15)
-   -   Graalian Awards - Playerworld of the Year! (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=46314)

Mykel 07-19-2003 06:04 AM

Graalian Awards - Playerworld of the Year!
 
If you don't know what this is about read the Graalian Awards thread in the Main forum. But this is to vote for the PW of the year!

This vote should be based on what server you think has made the greatest strides.

MadWolf 07-19-2003 06:53 AM

Era, even though I hate it. It has brought something new to the community and has been VERY successful.

tlf288 07-19-2003 06:57 AM

Era, same reason as Scott.

HoudiniMan 07-19-2003 09:19 AM

Kingdoms

MadWolf 07-19-2003 09:25 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by HoudiniMan
Kingdoms
Playerworld.

Minoc 07-19-2003 12:30 PM

Graal2001 isn't exactly a playeworld \=

protagonist 07-19-2003 01:13 PM

UN, it's almost always on top.

superb 07-19-2003 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by protagonist
UN, it's almost always on top.
That doesn't mean it is good.

protagonist 07-19-2003 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by superb


That doesn't mean it is good.

Ok, ask our 200+ daily playercount if it's good.

superb 07-19-2003 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by protagonist


Ok, ask our 200+ daily playercount if it's good.

The point is that whether its good or not is entirely subjective.

protagonist 07-19-2003 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by superb


The point is that whether its good or not is entirely subjective.

Quality is observed on an individual basis, yes. However, the greater collective majority of individuals seem to play UN.

Zurkiba 07-19-2003 03:56 PM

Graal 2230

Androk 07-19-2003 05:15 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by protagonist


Quality is observed on an individual basis, yes. However, the greater collective majority of individuals seem to play UN.

They play UN because alot of people play UN, so it's not really quality, more of a quantity =P

Dude6252000 07-19-2003 06:10 PM

Graal2001 is a playerworld now, because it's controlled by playerworlds. So no one else should be saying that. :x

HoudiniMan 07-19-2003 08:59 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MadWolf

Playerworld.

Kingdoms is the most fun and has made the most progress... I still vote for it.

DragonX 07-19-2003 09:03 PM

Unholy Nation. I played it long ago when it was new and I liked it. It has evolved so much and that's why it has the most players on it. The events are fun and I like it :megaeek:

MarkB 07-19-2003 09:19 PM

era, even though i cannot stand angel, when she had an idea for gun style server, everyone laughed. she did it, good job.

Golbez 07-19-2003 09:36 PM

Umm... the year is like 3/4th over whats the use of having awards now? x_x

Golbez 07-19-2003 09:42 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by tlf288


Because Mykel isn't very bright and likes to spam :grin: .

I say someone better get out the ban hammer on him ;)

Mykel 07-19-2003 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Golbez


I say someone better get out the ban hammer on him ;)

Thats not going to happen. ;)
I already confirmed this with Kai anyway. Read my post (origional one) in the graal forums bout these.

Golbez 07-19-2003 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Mykel
Thats not going to happen. ;)
I already confirmed this with Kai anyway. Read my post (origional one) in the graal forums bout these.

Ahh I see lol, sorry and I was joking lol. When ever I wink im joking :p

Thallen 07-20-2003 12:00 AM

Even though this is the playerworld I hate the most...I voted for Era. Era has brought a completely new style to Graal, as well as some new members, most likely. It has a nice tileset and great scripting, as well as a great manager.

Soul-Blade 07-20-2003 03:47 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by protagonist


Quality is observed on an individual basis, yes. However, the greater collective majority of individuals seem to play UN.

When I log onto a new game, I say "Hmm...that world has the most players, so I better play it". That is what newbies do. Out of all the playerworlds online, Graal2001 destroys them as far as quality and amount to do. As far as the "best" playerworld with originality, that is public, Era destroys all. All UN can say is it has a good playercount, because newbies go to un because it has the highest playercount. It will not go lower because of the fact people have made friends there, and contact friends there.

Quality and popularity are 2 very different stories. Just like how SOM is way more known then Terranigma. Terranigma beats SOM's story by a landslide, its graphics are better, and the battle is equal to, I'd say better because of the variety of different moves. SOM has Terranigma beat only on the magic system...still, SOM was much more popular...in this case probably because the company had a better name, and was known for the best in RPG games.

That comparisn is in a whole different league, because both Terranigma and SOM are amazing. UN is nothing more then gutter trash, Era was nice and very original, and Graal2001 is the best classic world there is. I use the term classic to describe worls using the old tileset, and theme.

Eric_1337 07-20-2003 07:36 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Soul-Blade

When I log onto a new game, I say "Hmm...that world has the most players, so I better play it". That is what newbies do. Out of all the playerworlds online, Graal2001 destroys them as far as quality and amount to do. As far as the "best" playerworld with originality, that is public, Era destroys all. All UN can say is it has a good playercount, because newbies go to un because it has the highest playercount. It will not go lower because of the fact people have made friends there, and contact friends there.

Quality and popularity are 2 very different stories. Just like how SOM is way more known then Terranigma. Terranigma beats SOM's story by a landslide, its graphics are better, and the battle is equal to, I'd say better because of the variety of different moves. SOM has Terranigma beat only on the magic system...still, SOM was much more popular...in this case probably because the company had a better name, and was known for the best in RPG games.

That comparisn is in a whole different league, because both Terranigma and SOM are amazing. UN is nothing more then gutter trash, Era was nice and very original, and Graal2001 is the best classic world there is. I use the term classic to describe worls using the old tileset, and theme.

Eh, your theory is incomplete, whatever happened to Graal Classic? Wasn't it always the best until something changed that... something had to have grabbed the players eyes and drawn them to it... it's called UnholyNation. Although UN doesn't have the best levels for the most part, the over-all scale of what goes on there is unbearable. There is a lot to do on UN other then "talk to friends". Someone who doesn't play UN would say what you have just utterd(sp?).

Graal Classic was always on top, I'm sure people made friends there and got thier stats up and had fun and all that, why did it lose players then? What's so different from UN to Classic?

It's everything that UN has to offer. UN has some of the best pking and sparring spots in all of graal. Their events are the most uniqely configured and most fun-filled events I will ever play. They also have the fact of questing and then all of their systems that deal with money were one of a kind.

Don't just say that all the ****ies go there because it's on the top of the list, there is obviously more to it.

TifaKhan 07-20-2003 09:12 AM

meh
Era: great place to be sexually harrassed
UN : great place to lag
Guess i know what i would vote

Soul-Blade 07-20-2003 10:10 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Eric_1337


Eh, your theory is incomplete, whatever happened to Graal Classic? Wasn't it always the best until something changed that... something had to have grabbed the players eyes and drawn them to it... it's called UnholyNation. Although UN doesn't have the best levels for the most part, the over-all scale of what goes on there is unbearable. There is a lot to do on UN other then "talk to friends". Someone who doesn't play UN would say what you have just utterd(sp?).

Graal Classic was always on top, I'm sure people made friends there and got thier stats up and had fun and all that, why did it lose players then? What's so different from UN to Classic?

It's everything that UN has to offer. UN has some of the best pking and sparring spots in all of graal. Their events are the most uniqely configured and most fun-filled events I will ever play. They also have the fact of questing and then all of their systems that deal with money were one of a kind.

Don't just say that all the ****ies go there because it's on the top of the list, there is obviously more to it.

Read the damn comparisn then open your smart mouth.

Classic was a crappy server as well, don't you understand that? People played it because it was already populated. I don't expect such a ignorant mind to understand what I am saying, so I won't bother to say any more.

Eric_1337 07-20-2003 07:37 PM

then how did that server lose those players? I mean your theory stats:

top server, with top playercount, is ****... but still gets players because of friends and thats all, they will never LOSE that playercount because of the friends.

Well Classic lost their playercount, so your theory is wrong.


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 08:46 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright (C) 1998-2019 Toonslab All Rights Reserved.