![]() |
Any chance...
..of bringing /partyaddally back ?
I wouldn't even mind if it was a 1 ally limit, I miss that function. |
The reason for it being removed as i recall was that parties were allying up and practicably turning into gangs. Even one ally party makes you a gang as if you had both parties on you would have more members on than a gang averagely does
|
But you need a free oped gun and at least a 2 level no-pk base with speaker and hat grabbers to be a gang.
|
So what, being Gold [i.e paying for Graal], you should get the full experience.
If that means getting blown off by Gangs, and you want to have some party's with friends, so what ? Clearly if you're party + allys are better then the gang itself, then that should push Gang leaders to recruit more members, more members more points more fun. Not enough kids are on gang tags anyways. |
Quote:
|
The idea was to limit parties so people would be more inclined join gangs. There wasn't much to separate a gang from a party at that time, and people were just allying parties instead of joining gangs -- which wasn't the purpose of parties.
There's a few new perks that gangs have over parties now, so I guess it could be cool to re-add allying. I'd say limit the number of allies to one or two though. |
It's a good idea but also make it so if a party is already allied noone else can ally them
|
Instead of bringing back allied parties, why not just make the party limit bigger?
|
why not join a gang together
|
Quote:
|
Bring forward the idea to purchase "gangs" already and remove parties. We want to purchase our own "gangs" :) or parties or whatever they were.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Krims right.
Btw, im almost back dude! Iloveyouboyfrieeend <3 |
So what had happened was.......
killaz (ya i kno we own) and like 6 other parties allied up and took over BH for like 20 minutes so Frankie cried and took off party allying cuz he said something like "wow this is stupid, whoever made party allying is retared. parties shouldn't be able to overrun gang bases." ??? Why don't you make the gangs better or stronger in some way? Not my fault they get owned. o.o EDIT: Krim sell me your Purple Noland on Era like 15k? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
ctrl v |
Why not remove gangs and expand the party system, it sounds like it would have more potential. Build parties like a guild/gang. Allow players to partner up, and if their party reaches a certain threshold it becomes a gang (activity, party size, etc) and have it lose gang status once it starts to fail requirements. Parties can absorb other parties if the leader of the other party accepts. You cannot be in a party if you're already in a party already (to keep from multiguilding).
|
Quote:
|
@ max sales was gonna do that...when he resigned the idea died
@ frankie.....QQ more? umad ya i support ur idea max |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Hmm,
Reset the gangs, Expand the party system's capabilities, Let rich people purchase gangs. but i know, LAT's will actually have to make more bases.../shocked this would be a nightmare , even though I'd offer to make bases in my sleep. |
Quote:
Bases were done before you even posted. :cool: |
Dargaro is a good add, but if his work pace is anything like kinetaro's. Our reset won't happen until the end of Obama's second term.
|
Quote:
|
Na.
|
All times are GMT +2. The time now is 03:23 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright (C) 1998-2019 Toonslab All Rights Reserved.