Graal Forums

Graal Forums (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/index.php)
-   Era Main Forum (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=162)
-   -   Suggestion (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=134259126)

Lime_O_Matic 05-11-2010 06:07 AM

Suggestion
 
I'd just like to make the point that many of Era's current players have a "family." These families are just a group of friends who all use the same last name on the game (ex. Erik Atrox, Donark Atrox, Eko Atrox, etc.) Era would be alot more enjoyable if we made a family system to base competition on families competing.

Ofcourse families can be so huge, so you can have a 10-15 member limit on them, but this can introduce I knew way of pking. Perhaps this can mix Gangs and Parties into an ultimate way in which Era can enjoy. Family events can be hold on weekends to improve competition which in all keeps the playercount high and makes Era enjoyable.

This is just a basic idea, but I think it's a start bringing Era to the top again. Please post your comments positive or negative to keep the ideas rollin'!

Good_Ol_Daze 05-11-2010 07:31 AM

Pros:
+This idea is definitely good enough to be implemented.

Cons:
-This idea is already implemented and it is the party system.

hunterhunk 05-11-2010 02:06 PM

This idea isn't bad, but there are already many ways where families can be together when they PK (Gangs, Parties). It would really be a waste of time to add a family system. Especially when the staff team have much bigger issues to deal with.

Eclipse 05-11-2010 04:04 PM

Cassini > Atrox

LordSquirt 05-11-2010 04:16 PM

what happens in ammo mart stays in ammo mart

Donark 05-11-2010 06:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eclipse (Post 1575382)
Cassini > Atrox

Atrox > Cassini

Quote:

Originally Posted by LordSquirt (Post 1575385)
what happens in ammo mart stays in ammo mart

Not at all squirt. yaknow what I'm talkin about.

Dnegel 05-11-2010 06:33 PM

I don't think this is really a bad idea at all.

Like, if you got less that 10 people, then you couldn't make a family. I support.

Frankie 05-11-2010 08:00 PM

what the **** is atrox?
the newer "families" these days are stupid
cassini4lyfe dog.

Donark 05-11-2010 08:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frankie (Post 1575411)
what the **** is atrox?
the newer "families" these days are stupid
cassini4lyfe dog.

It's not really that new. Not saying it's one of those oldbie 04' families, but it's been around for a little over a year. We're definitely on par with other families like Cassini. Also we're not a family made just for a week and add any random player.

FantasyX 05-11-2010 08:15 PM

A family system would be redundant.

1. The playercount can't support more groups for players to join. Until you have a feasible playercount, you can't implement families.
2. This would reduce gang activity, which is detrimental to an already PK-dead server.
3. Being part of two affiliations (gang and family) can be messy. Say one member of a family is in Blazian Bandits and one member is in Black Holst. When Blazian Bandits raids Black Holst, what do they do when they encounter each other? Run around and tap control h? It makes everything more complicated. Raiding is raiding, that's it.

Honestly, a good thing to do with a family concept could be to make some sort of event with it...a mob event or something.

iRedemption 05-11-2010 09:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donark (Post 1575415)
It's not really that new. Not saying it's one of those oldbie 04' families, but it's been around for a little over a year. We're definitely on par with other families like Cassini. Also we're not a family made just for a week and add any random player.

nah its like basiclly cassini is the golden toilet and atrox is the **** inside the golden toilet

Shadow5596321 05-11-2010 09:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lime_O_Matic (Post 1575329)
Donark Atrox

Please take note that it is not Donark, its Donanotherwordforamalesprivatepartotherthantheonet hatstartswithap. Thank you.

zim5354 05-11-2010 10:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frankie (Post 1575411)
what the **** is atrox?
the newer "families" these days are stupid
cassini4lyfe dog.

Cassini is a joke, Fiery 4 lyf plz.

Supaman771 05-11-2010 10:07 PM

./partyform

deathbarrier99 05-12-2010 01:01 AM

http://graalonline.com/guilds/viewguild?full=0&gid=6741

Rockin' the old school Cassini ydg

Vman13x 05-12-2010 01:14 AM

Hahahaha, as much as I hate most Cassini members I have to agree with them.

Cassini > Atrox
All day everyday that was pretty stupid of you donark.

hunterhunk 05-12-2010 05:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frankie (Post 1575411)
what the **** is atrox?
the newer "families" these days are stupid
cassini4lyfe dog.

I agree with this, except the way Cassini is now. I don't like the group of Cassinis that play Era. Ever since Geo left Era Cassini has gone down.

iRedemption 05-12-2010 06:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hunterhunk (Post 1575554)
I agree with this, except the way Cassini is now. I don't like the group of Cassinis that play Era. Ever since Geo left Era Cassini has gone down.

cassini got a whole lot better when you and people like corey stopped wearing the name ^^

Seeya 05-12-2010 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vman13x (Post 1575498)
All day everyday that was pretty stupid of you donark.

It's like your trying to start trouble with everyone, he's a much cooler guy then you.

Eclipse 05-12-2010 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hunterhunk (Post 1575554)
I agree with this, except the way Cassini is now. I don't like the group of Cassinis that play Era. Ever since Geo left Era Cassini has gone down.


umad u r fired

hunterhunk 05-12-2010 08:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eclipse (Post 1575599)
umad u r fired

Fired? No. I was never fired from Cassini. Don't know where you got that from

Old_Days 05-12-2010 10:56 PM

I think that there should be like a family tag, though, you would have to pay for it. Basically this tag would be in parentheses, ( ), and it would also have the word family in it, the player should get to choose whether it be at the beginning or end.

Example: (Atrox Family) or, (Family Atrox).

Now since the player is paying for their family, then they should have to have more control, and also the ability to add more player slots for players to join.

Lets say once they buy the family they would get however many slots a party could hold. Then they could open a GUI to add more player slots so more players can join, but only for a price.

there should also be special family upgrades that you could buy, like Increase Speed of Everyone In Family for 3 minutes. or somthing like that.

Just some thoughts.

hunterhunk 05-12-2010 11:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Old_Days (Post 1575656)
I think that there should be like a family tag, though, you would have to pay for it. Basically this tag would be in parentheses, ( ), and it would also have the word family in it, the player should get to choose whether it be at the beginning or end.

Example: (Atrox Family) or, (Family Atrox).

Now since the player is paying for their family, then they should have to have more control, and also the ability to add more player slots for players to join.

Lets say once they buy the family they would get however many slots a party could hold. Then they could open a GUI to add more player slots so more players can join, but only for a price.

there should also be special family upgrades that you could buy, like Increase Speed of Everyone In Family for 3 minutes. or somthing like that.

Just some thoughts.

I think if they did this, it should be like a guild tag. For example: Eclipse (Cassini).

There was a time where all of the Soul Family members had a (Thieves) tag, but they were deleted about 2 days later.

I still think it would be a complete waste of time.

Good_Ol_Daze 05-13-2010 12:05 AM

Alright this thread is stupid now. Somebody lock it or delete my posts in it.

Dnegel 05-13-2010 05:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Good_Ol_Daze (Post 1575665)
Alright this thread is stupid now. Somebody lock it or delete my posts in it.

You can delete your own posts if you dont know already. :noob:

salesman 05-13-2010 06:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dnegel (Post 1575803)
You can delete your own posts if you dont know already. :noob:

not after a certain amount of time

Old_Days 05-13-2010 09:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hunterhunk (Post 1575659)
I think if they did this, it should be like a guild tag. For example: Eclipse (Cassini).

There was a time where all of the Soul Family members had a (Thieves) tag, but they were deleted about 2 days later.

I still think it would be a complete waste of time.

Yeah for the time right now it would be a huge waste of time..

But I was thinking about the guild tag being like that, but then gangs wouldnt really be the ones with the special "name-only" tags. I think gangs should still have that right, tag wise.

Vman13x 05-13-2010 11:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Seeya (Post 1575580)
It's like your trying to start trouble with everyone, he's a much cooler guy then you.

Everyone? It's only donark kid. I could care less if he's a cooler guy than me on a game.

Dnegel 05-13-2010 11:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by salesman (Post 1575817)
not after a certain amount of time

Why can't you delete so many in a row then? :confused:

Good_Ol_Daze 05-13-2010 11:33 PM

You can't delete a post if someone's made a post after it.

You're kind of right though. Ideally this thread would not have gotten any more replies after mine and I would be able to delete my post myself.

Old_Days 05-14-2010 02:11 AM

Jesus cant we stay on topic for at least 4 ****ing posts in a row?

Good_Ol_Daze 05-14-2010 02:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Old_Days (Post 1576024)
Jesus cant we stay on topic for at least 4 ****ing posts in a row?

This thread is over. Dude's just suggesting the party system be renamed or implemented twice, both of which are dumb ideas.

You're setting a good example here though. This thread's original topic I believe was about getting really pissy right? Way 2 maintain.

Demisis_P2P 05-14-2010 08:33 AM

there is a fatal flaw with this idea because if i marry a girl on era then does she have to join my family?
because what if my family has a blood feud with her family?
we need to keep our love a secret.

Rave_J 05-14-2010 04:45 PM

Eric ur idea could work but it would be a waste since era doesnt have enough players to support this an gangs an party system i think party system should go to

Vman13x 05-16-2010 05:39 AM

Don't worry dem I'll get rid of my family to join yours because I love you.

death_striker 05-22-2010 04:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frankie (Post 1575411)
what the **** is atrox?
the newer "families" these days are stupid
cassini4lyfe dog.

Look who crawled out from under that rock and it's

Zephlyn>Cassini get it right

Eclipse 05-22-2010 05:01 PM

wrong

Frankie 05-22-2010 05:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by death_striker (Post 1577869)
Look who crawled out from under that rock and it's

Zephlyn>Cassini get it right

i haven't been under a rock. i still browse the forums every so often.

Vman13x 05-23-2010 12:40 AM

Zephlyn > Cassini because Cassini members suck.

iRedemption 05-23-2010 03:51 AM

Led Zephlyn is a noob tho


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 10:38 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright (C) 1998-2019 Toonslab All Rights Reserved.