Name 10 of these 100 please.

i wouldn't know, i only play 3 servers, but i'm sure that there's atleast 10.

I'm just gonna stop reading whatever you post from now on.

Oh, man I found out yesterday you can vote for two options when taking this poll. Lol great after I send the thread to a handful of people... Haha dang thats like 5 free votes down the drain atleast.

Good idea.

Yea the poll doesnt tell anyone the real story when they can vote twice.

Polls never really did tell the true story as its far too easy to just bribe someone or just simply log in with a different account.

Doesnt really matter though I think in some way or another we have all decided on things like this. Some people just hate certain kingdoms which doesnt help voting. Its not just some indescriminate survey like it should have been, not a poll open to the public.

choices with circles next to them to click means that you can only chose one, however, choices with squares next to them to click means that you can vote multiple times.

The basic difference between radio buttons and check boxes.

I've posted this in another thread, but I want to iterate it here as well.
If each kingdom had access to some type of EM tools, such as the EMs themselves do. And these events can only be joined (programatically) by the kingdom members that EM is in, then a kingdom leader can either himself or appoint someone to handle such things and then can create events more often for their members. The kingdom specific EMs could then have to compete in events dedicated to themselves to earn access to more event games. For instance a new kingdom EM might be only able to access musical chairs, but through EM events he/she can earn something like waterglass. This would also promote the hiring of kingdom EMs between the kingdoms, paying more for EMs who have a larger arsenal of games in their 'toolbox'.
Players would then base their kingdom choice on who keeps them busy with activities, not based on which kingdom is the 'coolest' or which kingdom has the most popular player who has the 'best' equipment that they might one day want to give away so everyone wants to be their buddy in hopes that they might get great stuff for free one day.

I don't really see the point of Kingdoms Events Masters. Kingdom events can easily be hosted without Events Master tools.

Musical chairs (lame but fun)
waterglass
Raffle (I'd like to be able to raffle off stuff to my members)
Possibly spar, I'm unsure if members can spar amongst themselves.

I know this is a little late, but I cant believe that this is even being considered. If you want anything with the Kingdoms to be useful its called you have to first have people playing Graal Kingdoms actively and have a player base, which only new content, better current content, and more things for people to do will be able to cure our current problem. So if there is a problem with inactive kingdoms, its called attract more players with more content.

Doing normal events for a kingdom is lazy. Kingdom members won't turn up for kingdom events that are boring and normal. You have to put some thought into making kingdom events.

I voted Zormite, they're the odd ball of the group. I could have easily been swayed by the kingdom i lothe - Pirates - But chose to decide fairly.

Why not forest? I feel indifferent about them, i understand they've had some diplomacy issues but they have good active ambassidors.

Zormite... I can only think of Fenix and in the end, they're all just fishes :(

Are we going to get some kind of verdict on whether any kingdoms are going to be removed or what?