Graal Forums

Graal Forums (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/index.php)
-   Your opinion (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=195)
-   -   Graals Population (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=86123)

Nelm 07-01-2009 09:27 PM

Regardless of content and development tools, Graal will never see a sustainable boom in player count until the price drops, IMO.

xXziroXx 07-01-2009 09:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nelm (Post 1503374)
Regardless of content and development tools, Graal will never see a sustainable boom in player count until the price drops, IMO.

More like until it finds a better way of introducing new players to the game, but that's not possible at the moment due to the horrible quality of servers comparing to the gameplay of most other free MMORPG's.

Nelm 07-01-2009 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xXziroXx (Post 1503380)
...free MMORPG's.

Something Graal is not and should be. Graal is outdated and to be honest, I highly doubt that even if there were 5 quality servers to choose from that people would be willing to continuously willing to upgrade to play it. I could be wrong, but I just don't see it happening.

Hiro 07-01-2009 10:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DustyPorViva (Post 1503356)
Ya it does.

how is it going to help if no one is uses them? having updates for 5 percent of the graal population (basically developers) instead of updates for 95 percent of graal's population (actual players) is plain stupid

we need actual content, not stuff to help make making content, theirs enough already - it isn't a problem

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robin (Post 1503373)
These things are intrinsically linked, fools.

when did i say they weren't? i'm saying it's not needed, further updates for making development isn't going to help if theirs no one left to develop, which is what will happen if the current decline keeps up

DustyPorViva 07-01-2009 10:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hiro (Post 1503391)
how is it going to help if no one is uses them? having updates for 5 percent of the graal population (basically developers) instead of updates for 95 percent of graal's population (actual players) is plain stupid

we need actual content, not stuff to help make making content, theirs enough already - it isn't a problem

The fact that just about 99% of Graal is content made by players, it is very important. Not to mention anything developed even by Stefan is going to be using the same tools.

xXziroXx 07-01-2009 11:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nelm (Post 1503383)
Something Graal is not and should be. Graal is outdated and to be honest, I highly doubt that even if there were 5 quality servers to choose from that people would be willing to continuously willing to upgrade to play it. I could be wrong, but I just don't see it happening.

I'm completely against Graal's subscription methods, and believe they should do what most other games seems to do, and use in-game Shop for various vanity items instead. But for that to be possible, there needs to be at least one quality server, something Graal lacks.

Hiro 07-01-2009 11:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DustyPorViva (Post 1503394)
The fact that just about 99 of Graal is content made by players, it is very important. Not to mention anything developed even by Stefan is going to be using the same tools.

okay, but that doesn't invalidate my point at all, it still stands that it's going to be useless for most every player, and new development tools aren't going to bring in more players, agreed?

now imagine how excited we'd all be about the updates if stefan was announcing a new server

DustyPorViva 07-02-2009 12:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hiro (Post 1503406)
okay, but that doesn't invalidate my point at all, it still stands that it's going to be useless for most every player, and new development tools aren't going to bring in more players, agreed?

now imagine how excited we'd all be about the updates if stefan was announcing a new server

And how will Stefan make these great updates without updated tools?

Hiro 07-02-2009 01:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DustyPorViva (Post 1503413)
And how will Stefan make these great updates without updated tools?

how will it be any better than making them right now? are you saying that stefan is incapable of making content because of the outdated tools he's trying to use? :rolleyes:

DustyPorViva 07-02-2009 02:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hiro (Post 1503429)
how will it be any better than making them right now? are you saying that stefan is incapable of making content because of the outdated tools he's trying to use? :rolleyes:

Outdated tools = outdated content. He could make much better content with more updated tools.

Hiro 07-02-2009 03:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DustyPorViva (Post 1503436)
Outdated tools = outdated content. He could make much better content with more updated tools.

so content built with outdated tools /= fun? or more specifically, old/boring content > new content built with "outdated tools"?

:rolleyes: if you're going to argue for better tools, then i guess you must be a huge fan of the success that is graal3d? because that uses such a better system for creation, such more sophistication in development, just about every developer is trying to create things for graal3d right?

i mean seriously, get your priorities straight.

xXziroXx 07-02-2009 03:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hiro (Post 1503450)
:rolleyes: if you're going to argue for better tools, then i guess you must be a huge fan of the success that is graal3d? because that uses such a better system for creation, such more sophistication in development, just about every developer is trying to create things for graal3d right?

From what I've gathered, a lot of developers (myself included) is against Graal 3D, so I'm not sure what you're basing your opinion over. Graal 3D isn't even actively being worked on, Stefan posted himself that it was more or less an "experiment" on CJ's side.

DustyPorViva 07-02-2009 03:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hiro (Post 1503450)
so content built with outdated tools /= fun? or more specifically, old/boring content > new content built with "outdated tools"?

:rolleyes: if you're going to argue for better tools, then i guess you must be a huge fan of the success that is graal3d? because that uses such a better system for creation, such more sophistication in development, just about every developer is trying to create things for graal3d right?

i mean seriously, get your priorities straight.

lol, you really are making assumptions here.

Hiro 07-02-2009 04:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xXziroXx (Post 1503452)
From what I've gathered, a lot of developers (myself included) is against Graal 3D, so I'm not sure what you're basing your opinion over. Graal 3D isn't even actively being worked on, Stefan posted himself that it was more or less an "experiment" on CJ's side.

yea, i know, i was being sarcastic because it was an utter failure no matter which way you look at it, but it did happen to use more up to date tools :rolleyes:

fowlplay4 07-02-2009 05:06 AM

It'd be sweet if it wasn't just Stefan developing the Graal client and the development tools for it, then just maybe we wouldn't be complaining about things being out of date.


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 08:02 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright (C) 1998-2019 Toonslab All Rights Reserved.