Graal Forums

Graal Forums (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/index.php)
-   Graal Main Forum (English) (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   New forum tags... (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=54534)

Loriel 08-10-2004 06:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by davidpsy
loriel [...] is just now saying he did it to prove a point to get out of being banned

If I get banned for this, it is completely fine with me as I reached my goal here.

Goboom 08-10-2004 06:58 PM

MOONIE! Do you have any logic in that thing that you call a brain!
Read my posts again and think about them this time!

GOD YOU REALLY BUG ME!

Loriel as a global was doing his job, by showing people the flaw.
He did make an attempt to contact Tux, it is not his fault Tux did not respond.

Loriel 08-10-2004 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicalTux
all messages you send are ignored.

Sigh. And I eventually thought I just had the wrong UIN.
Not very handy to ignore my messages if you expect to be contacted about problems.

davidpsy 08-10-2004 07:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Loriel
You completely make sense here. You know, if we let people get away with doing good things, very good things might happen, and we do not want that, do we?

Look Loriel it is apperent that you did this because you wanted to prove a point and you did, I'm happy for you. In this case I dont really think you would need to be banned. But I do think its unfair had someone who is non global done this they would have been banned. I think graal as a whole needs to stop being so ban happy.

Goboom 08-10-2004 07:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by davidpsy
Look Loriel it is apperent that you did this because you wanted to prove a point and you did, I'm happy for you. In this case I dont really think you would need to be banned. But I do think its unfair had someone who is non global done this they would have been banned. I think graal as a whole needs to stop being so ban happy.

How do you know someone that does not have global rights would be banned?

davidpsy 08-10-2004 07:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Goboom
How do you know someone that does not have global rights would be banned?

I dunno, I assume they would.

Butz 08-10-2004 07:57 PM

Well, to go off-topic from this accusatory cavalcade for a moment, but perhaps remaining on-topic to the thread in general, I think this is a very nice addition. It'll add some nice options to formatting posts and perhaps conserve space as well.

Loriel 08-10-2004 08:13 PM

Heh. Your sig makes nice use of the tags.

dlang 08-10-2004 08:38 PM

Loriel I see how you were trying to demonstrate how that feature could be abused yet your methods for doing so are flawed. In my opinion, you shouldn't be banned, but the rules aren't my opinion. Because of your actions you should be banned though.

Goboom 08-10-2004 08:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dlang
Loriel I see how you were trying to demonstrate how that feature could be abused yet your methods for doing so are flawed. In my opinion, you shouldn't be banned, but the rules aren't my opinion. Because of your actions you should be banned though.

Sir, you just contradicted yourself.

brock128 08-10-2004 08:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kaimetsu
This is stupid. Do you people even know what bans are for? What possible purpose could be served by removing Loriel from the community?

One less unstable corrupt/uncorrupt attitude global in the world?
Quote:

Originally Posted by Goboom
There is also no proof that that form "stole" passwords from users also if it did steal passwords it would only steal the forum password, its your fault if you choose not to change your forum account password to something diffrent than your Graal Account Password.

Why else would it exist?
Quote:

Originally Posted by Loriel
Which I am not. If you could just stop impliedly accusing me of that, we could drop this topic... ?

You've shown corruption more then once. Why not now?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Goboom
Loriel as a global was doing his job, by showing people the flaw.
He did make an attempt to contact Tux, it is not his fault Tux did not respond.

Except showing the fact that he doesn't know how to use ICQ...

You know what? I give up. Just ban him already.

Loriel 08-10-2004 08:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brock128
You've shown corruption more then once.

Oh?

Quote:

You know what? I give up. Just ban him already.
Way to win an argument.

Rick 08-10-2004 09:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Loriel
Heh. Your sig makes nice use of the tags.

That's why I asked MagicalTux to add them, so I could align my signature like that. :p

GoZelda 08-10-2004 09:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Loriel
And deed anything bad happen because you clicked on my link yet?

Yes, you risking to be banned :frown:
No, I changed my password x_x

Dach 08-10-2004 09:48 PM

hehe, if we can't trust Loriel, why does he have global RC? ;)
Geez, I mean if we can't trust anyone we meet on the internet, then why do we have people with Global RC or Supermod powers? I mean, I haven't met them personally, and I doubt Unix or Stefan has... :rolleyes:

Good grief, if you're going to ban him for getting his point across in this, obviously, discussion-worthy method, do it. It'll just reveal you as a hypocrite. Good grief, if he was actually stealing passwords, he should definitely be banned. But, all he did was create something to definitively prove the security issue of the new feature.

Darlene159 08-10-2004 10:05 PM

I am done with this conversation, you talk in circles Loriel...and what you are saying here is different then what you said on AIM.

I will say this...if anyone EVER does something like this again, I dont care who it is, and I dont care what reason you have for doing so....I will not hesitate to ban them, let this be fair warning
Quote:

Loriel as a global was doing his job, by showing people the flaw.
He did make an attempt to contact Tux, it is not his fault Tux did not respond.
"the people" did not need to see the flaw, only the person who can fix it needed to see it, and saying "I tried to contact so and so, but he ignored me" sounds like what the members said in the illegal threads that are removed all the time...I dont do double standards

Loriel 08-10-2004 10:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Darlene159
saying "I tried to contact so and so, but he ignored me" sounds like what the members said in the illegal threads that are removed all the time...

What does that mean?

Darlene159 08-10-2004 10:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Loriel
What does that mean?

It means, that you dont get to do something that is against the rules just because you cant get ahold of the appropriate person right away, and do not ask me again what rule that you broke...go read the Graal rules

Loriel 08-10-2004 10:36 PM

The appropriate person ignored my messages, Moonie.

Crono 08-10-2004 10:42 PM

Actually hold on a second. Doesnt Loriel get a warning first?

Loriel 08-10-2004 10:46 PM

Why would I get a warning? No one is even able to show me a rule I broke.

GoZelda 08-10-2004 10:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Loriel
Why would I get a warning? No is even able to show me a rule I broke.

Actually, those that fell for your trick broke a rule, because they gave out their password :p

Loriel 08-10-2004 10:52 PM

Indeed.

And:
Quote:

Discussions of bans are not permissible. If you have a question about a ban or would like to make an appeal, contact the relevant administrator by Forum PM (Private Message) or by e-mail.

If you feel that you have been wronged by a moderator, contact a higher member of staff such as a supermod or admin, and calmly explain the situation. Do not disregard what you have been told, regardless of whether or not you consider it fair or reasonable.
Moonie, stop discussing whether I am to be banned. Instead, you should contact a higher member of staff and calmly explain the situation.

Turles_is_back 08-10-2004 11:37 PM

Ha ha ha ha. This is great. Sadly I missed it 'cause I was in school.

Ha ha ha. :D *steps out*

Darlene159 08-11-2004 12:04 AM

Ok, Loriel...you are just acting like a little kid now....you did it, you got by with it, you had your fun, you proved your point....end of discussion

Lance 08-11-2004 12:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Darlene159
do not ask me again what rule that you broke...go read the Graal rules

If you say he broke a rule, the burdon of proof is yours, not his. I say this merely because I am curious about which rule he broke, as well...

Loriel 08-11-2004 12:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Darlene159
you did it, you got by with it, you had your fun, you proved your point...

I am glad you agree with me :)

Darlene159 08-11-2004 01:44 AM

lol, so if there is no specific rule for what was done, it is ok?
You know, I am getting a really bad feeling about this.....

Galdor 08-11-2004 01:49 AM

... shhh!

Goboom 08-11-2004 02:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Darlene159
lol, so if there is no specific rule for what was done, it is ok?
You know, I am getting a really bad feeling about this.....

The feeling that you have finally realized you are wrong about something?
Even though you have been wrong a million times.

brock128 08-11-2004 03:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Loriel
Way to win an argument.

You act like I still care.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Darlene159
I will say this...if anyone EVER does something like this again, I dont care who it is, and I dont care what reason you have for doing so....I will not hesitate to ban them, let this be fair warning

Way to make a bad judgement and not ban him.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Loriel
The appropriate person ignored my messages, Moonie.

Because he didn't know you were contacting him.
Read -> Comprehend -> Post
Quote:

Originally Posted by GoZelda
Actually, those that fell for your trick broke a rule, because they gave out their password :p

They were scammed into doing so. Scamming = illegal.

And since nobody can point a finger as to what rule he broke, I will. He (attempted anyway) to scam people of their accounts. I'm sure it's in the ToS, but I can't find it in the trainwreck of a website.

Lance 08-11-2004 03:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brock128
You act like I still care.

Well, you posted.

Quote:

They were scammed into doing so. Scamming = illegal.
Calling a sheep's tail a leg does not make it one.

Quote:

And since nobody can point a finger as to what rule he broke, I will. He (attempted anyway) to scam people of their accounts. I'm sure it's in the ToS, but I can't find it in the trainwreck of a website.
"And since nobody can point a finger as to what rule he broke...I can't either".

He did not try to scam anyone out of their accounts, as has been duly noted.

Zalastri 08-11-2004 04:31 AM

I'd trust loriel with my account, hell he has access to all of our gold accounts items and stuff >.>. I find it odd that Moonie is still staff, she is abbrahsive (Spelling?) to the community. I know loriels a decent guy and she should know that about her fellow.. staffers.. =\

Kaimetsu 08-11-2004 05:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Darlene159
I will tell you what purpose it would serve, it would tell the members of this community that we are all equal when it comes to the rules....

Which rule did Loriel break?

People, nobody is arguing against a ban because of Loriel's position. They're arguing against a ban because there is no reason to administer a ban.

Quote:

Originally Posted by brock128
One less unstable corrupt/uncorrupt attitude global in the world?

How has this prank revealed that Loriel is either corrupt or unstable?

MagicalTux 08-11-2004 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Loriel
Sigh. And I eventually thought I just had the wrong UIN.
Not very handy to ignore my messages if you expect to be contacted about problems.

I do not expect people to contact me via ICQ. You can mail and use forum PMs.

Note that my ICQ number isn't displayed anywhere on Graal...

Loriel 08-11-2004 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brock128
Because he didn't know you were contacting him.
Read -> Comprehend -> Post

Yeah, and that is my fault how?

Quote:

Originally Posted by MagicalTux
I do not expect people to contact me via ICQ. You can mail and use forum PMs.
Note that my ICQ number isn't displayed anywhere on Graal...

But we talked on ICQ before.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Darlene159
lol, so if there is no specific rule for what was done, it is ok?

No, there are still these catch-all clauses in the rules. I was just upset with your `` read the rules yourself to find out which one you broke '' attitude.

Zethar 08-11-2004 12:58 PM

[QUOTE=Kaimetsu]Which rule did Loriel break?[QUOTE]

:\ Trying to steal passwords? I know Loriel wouldn't doing anything with it, it's the fact that he even tried to set it up in the first place.

Do you think anyone would of even thought of that? So why not just PM MagicalTux, it's not like you were in a big rush to save the community.

Loriel 08-11-2004 01:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zethar
So why not just PM MagicalTux, it's not like you were in a big rush to save the community.

I usually do not assume that valid ICQ messages I sent just get ignored. I saw no need to send any PMs.

MagicalTux 08-11-2004 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Loriel
I usually do not assume that valid ICQ messages I sent just get ignored. I saw no need to send any PMs.

You sent them to an ICQ# which appears to be offline for months...

Kaimetsu 08-11-2004 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zethar
:\ Trying to steal passwords?

Where is this rule?


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 03:50 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright (C) 1998-2019 Toonslab All Rights Reserved.