![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Look everyone stop arguing here let a mod decide I dun care outcome I messed up.
|
Yes well atleast I try to spell.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
*whew* Just finished reading all of this and will just make one brief comment.....
The offending person who changed the sig to link to "porn" should be "Banned" Changing the link for whatever reason is a willful and diliberate act. As for the people who also had linked to the sig , they on the other hand must also take responsiblity for their actions, they on their own accord linked to it and are responsible for its content as well, to claim no resposiblity is adsurd. They are indeed accessories after the fact, if they do not want to be caught up in something like this , then they should only "link" to material that they have control over and not to things they don't , for they are STILL responsible for whatever changes ocurr with it as "long as they" are linked to it. all I have to say on the matter ......... |
NeoNPL NOT scream:
Slag you ***** you hosted the con signature because Craig asked you to , you even posted the link to it on the forums. You are such a *****. Alkaren , you shouldnt just ban straight away , see theres this moderator thing called "email" you could of emailed us telling us he had changed the image and we would of remove it from our signatues. Thanks for thinking. |
Re: wtf should I get in trouble for?
Quote:
1.) Having pornographical pictures in your signature. I don't care WHO uploaded it, you shouldn't have linked to it. If registering an account on another site for a picture is so important, do it with a trustworthy site. 2.) Racial name-calling and the use of much profanity. 3.) You're an idiot. Period. NeoNPL and Brock should not be banned. Neither of them. It's not their fault some idiot posted a porn picture because they were "stealing" a picture. If everyone were like that, most of the people with pictures in their signatures would have porn in it. I've seen at least 10 from ign.com. More from other sites. |
Quote:
You *****. HERE YOU GO SLAG YOU DUMMY YOU SAID PEOPLE CAN USE IT. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
And it is not the case that he has "Replacing images with porn instead of acceptable images" syndrom. (No offence meant to anyone with any compulsive behaviour syndromes, nor to anyone who knows people who do have it) |
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT +2. The time now is 07:17 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright (C) 1998-2019 Toonslab All Rights Reserved.