![]() |
Hey guess what genius, just about everyone of us started with nothing...back when PW projects were rare (the good ol' days) I was the only one working for some time...now a few others are.
Oh and guess what, just about everyone makes there graphics from scratch genius. I know I do. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
why dont you just wait until the server is like 75% done or something to submit??
|
Quote:
Yah and thats comming from a Faheria LAT....*sough* *** *cough* At least kodias aint going to release his playwerold and get a UC sign next to it with 1 level and the way to make money is to pick grass...Kondias is smart. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
uhm, it is a poll, and an opinion... its not like stefan is asking which Pws to take down here... :rolleyes:
|
I cant choose one server half of them should be taken down
i am making a server and have more content them most of those servers do |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Geez... and I am gonna do taht alone... and as I see Fatheria has like what? 5 LATS several pretty good NATs and yet... nothing... |
I think if Stefan doesn't have a problem with a playerworld being up, neither should the players. Big deal if an extra server is listed when you log on.
THE WORLD IS GOING TO END! |
All right then, it's settled :) 6 months to make a succesful and FUN playerworld on your own.
|
oooooo
Hello, my name is Kino and my post as been replaced with this, seeing how it was what Crono deemed "forum garbage."
Have a nice day! |
Quote:
And I never got to visit Paris ;_; |
oooo
:o the world will not end silly duck....geez.....
|
But he said so :( It must be true.
On Topic: Looks like more people hate X than anywhere else x.x... Well it doesn't have a reason to be online now that I think about it :x |
Re: oooooo
Quote:
|
delete all the playerworlds with under 50 players thats been online for like 3 months bc there's too many of them and no one is playing on it.it's just a waste of space
|
"OH NO! This playerworld is taking up too much space! Dear god it must be taken down so that I won't have to move my arm an extra 2 millimeters to the playerworld I want to go to! God it's taking up too much "space!"
In a nutshell, you are all a bunch of *****s (Except for a few people). |
Quote:
:) Am I a *****? :D |
I think I'm one by default O_o
Stefan took DV down yesterday, that's all I care about. I really don't mind the other ten-some servers that draw in 10 staff and one person, but hey, this is just a poll x.x |
Quote:
So, yes. I am a ***** to. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
P.S.: Konidias, remember, ALONE, no one to help you. If you suceed, well that's great, you'll give the Graalians a great PW like we intended to do, if you fail, omi will I be laughing :) |
Re: Which playerworlds should be removed?
Quote:
It is very hard to find anyone willing or interested in helping that has the skill(s) I need. I was hoping that with the release of my JobClass BETA, I might get a few people to help out...seems that kinda bit the dust :o Please consider yourself fortunate, Konidias. Without even requesting much, you've had many people that have what I'm looking for coming to you to help. All I seem to attract are newbies looking for an RC with which they can brag to friends with. |
i voted for all of them.
why not bring backwhat they had in earlier versions so people can host thier own servers? or if not at least make Expanding Columns for UC servers. in my opinion i think u should take off p2p servers that aren't getting 20+ players on average and free servers that aren't getting over 50. PS: honestly i don't give a damn if people don't agree with what i say, it's my opinion |
Quote:
If another p2p server gets even close to 50 it's probably because it just got put up :p |
If we were to have let Walbomania stay up, none of this would have happened, right?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
umm g_yoshi i said free servers that don't get over 50 should be deleted
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Those rules would mean that there would be about four or five playerworlds online ;)
Doomsday, for example, gets about 45 people at its peak time - however, unlike some playerworlds, it keeps its peak time for 5-6 hours, and even when most playerworlds struggle to get 10 players, Doomsday has at least 10, sometimes even more than popular places like N-Pulse and UN (and sometimes Graal2001) entravial, does your suggestion that a playerworld that is consititently populated (for at least 20 hours a day) should be taken offline? Also, in regard to UC playerworlds - can't you make some sort of example world? I remember when we were redoing Doomsday's overworld, and we created a preview world, with a few heart quests and such - it kept players satisfied until we were able to fully release the new levels. Can't you make a place with a few things to do, a few quests, just enough to keep people happy until the full playerworld is released? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Now if only 9/10 of those people weren't always staff... -Jinx |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT +2. The time now is 08:11 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright (C) 1998-2019 Toonslab All Rights Reserved.