Graal Forums - Playerworld Previews

Graal Forums (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/index.php)

- PlayerWorlds Main Forum (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=15)

- - Playerworld Previews (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=87840)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pelikano (Post 1522192)

Maloria? Wasn't Ziro's deadline like 2 months, which ended about 512 years 5 months 29 days 3 hours 23 minutes and 53 seconds ago?

My "deadline" was to have it playable enough to be able to at least do something in 2 months, which I was able to complete without trouble.

If you expect a lot of quality gameplay content you'll have to either sit back and watch the progress, or actually lend a hand. I'm not about to release a half-assed server or skip things to have it released faster, there's no point in ruining Maloria's reputation like that.

Quote:

Originally Posted by xXziroXx (Post 1522182)

Sorry about that! Was an older system I've used since the days of Mythic Legends to allow mass-resets easily whenever system changes required it. I took the time to rewrote it after realizing how frustrating it is in combination with Observer Mode, and you shouldn't encounter anything on the server that forces you to reconnect now.

Minor change, but surely something that'll make people a lot less frustrated. :)

Thanks for fixing it :)

Quote:

Originally Posted by DustyPorViva (Post 1522188)

Ah, so it's a preview?

Thats what the title says!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gambet (Post 1522189)

I don't know why there's so much hostility, I think it's a pretty good idea. Would be good if you guys got Stefan to eventually add a preview tab and for now just use the Preview: prefix, but hopefully you will not just settle with that and never look into getting it officially implemented (because it should be).

Nice work. :)

TSA and Xor will be handling the applications and acceptance for the preview servers. If there is enough of them out there to warrant it then we'll ask Stefan about getting a separate tab. If this turns out to only be the occasional server though that actually applies and qualifies then I really see no need for a special tab. Hoping for the former though.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bell (Post 1522155)

This is where your information is not exactly correct. We are all asked by developers what type of server [insert servername here] is. We believe that by doing this, it will not only encourage server renters to try to improve the quality of their servers to beat out the other guy for better staff. But will also give give interested developers something to actually look at and decide for themselves if they feel said server is something they would like to participate in.

As far as the accounts status goes. This is not the thread for that. That is a separate issue that has nothing to do with the PWA and what we are trying to achieve here. You are not the first to complain nor will you be the last. We cannot immediately affect that change and its a battle we've not yet chosen to fight. Random rants about it will do nothing to cause change. It usually has the opposite affect and does little more than label you as a troublemaker. Another time, another place, just not here and now.

and that's why nothing ever gets done, people with power positions such as yourself having either indifferent or nonparticipating opinions about player-important problems within the game. do you not see that if you guys spoke up as we do, that a lot more would get done, instead of nothing getting done?

also my question still stands from the former post and pertains to how exactly we go about explaining a server's description in terms of how much development has been achieved

Well, I can't wait to see how this will work out..

Offtopic:
xXziroXx, Your signature is wrong spelled..? Or not?
Isn't it: Maloria has 5 Players (Have>Has)

Quote:

Originally Posted by DuBsTeRmAn (Post 1522312)

Offtopic:
xXziroXx, Your signature is wrong spelled..? Or not?
Isn't it: Maloria has 5 Players (Have>Has)

Maloria is third person, so yes, you're correct. :)