Graal Forums

Graal Forums (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/index.php)
-   PlayerWorlds Main Forum (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=15)
-   -   Worst Modern Server (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=86136)

LordSquirt 06-02-2009 09:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CharlieM (Post 1496429)
Refer to it as Atrius the world at war thing is stupid imo,

Era is on the Classic tab yes, but a lot of servers came around the same time as Era or before Era made Classic even,

I remember the first time Atrius went hosted it beat out Eras playercount, until it got shut down by Era staff.

Now its been going so long it just keeps getting degraded by new staff that dont have a clue at what they are doing

When any server gets reset more players would tend to play the server. For example, if we reset Era right now everyone would have an equal chance to be the richest and etc. That would encourage a lot of players to play the server and they most likely are going to work on the server a lot to try to get the most items and money. It doesn't matter if a server at first is a big hit, it matters if the server can sustain it's playercount over a long period of time. Look at Graal Ghetto for example. It used to have 60 people+ at this CURRENT time it's playercount is 0. What a surprise!

salesman 06-02-2009 09:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by LordSquirt (Post 1496466)
When any server gets reset more players would tend to play the server. For example, if we reset Era right now everyone would have an equal chance to be the richest and etc. That would encourage a lot of players to play the server and they most likely are going to work on the server a lot to try to get the most items and money. It doesn't matter if a server at first is a big hit, it matters if the server can sustain it's playercount over a long period of time. Look at Graal Ghetto for example. It used to have 60 people+ at this CURRENT time it's playercount is 0. What a surprise!

Yea if we reset Era, the playercount would probably hit 200 for a few days...the trick is keeping it that high.

Frankie 06-02-2009 10:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CharlieM (Post 1496429)
Refer to it as Atrius the world at war thing is stupid imo,

Era is on the Classic tab yes, but a lot of servers came around the same time as Era or before Era made Classic even,

I remember the first time Atrius went hosted it beat out Eras playercount, until it got shut down by Era staff.

Now its been going so long it just keeps getting degraded by new staff that dont have a clue at what they are doing

the only reason why I included the "world at war" part in atrius' name because I was comparing it to call of duty 5. just wanted to clarify.

it doesn't matter what servers were made when era was made. I don't see how this relates to the argument at all. we're talking about modern servers here. I understand that there were other servers before era, but era was the first to introduce a modern theme.

just because atrius beat era's player count a handful of times does not instantly make it better. we've seen graal ghetto reach high numbers past era. does that make them better than era? not really. after all the hype runs out people will return to their original servers and there won't be any more than like 20 people on atrius. (half the player count is probably staff and RC too)

DustyPorViva 06-02-2009 11:03 PM

Dude, Atrius overwrote my head0.png. NOT COOL.

Codein 06-02-2009 11:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DustyPorViva (Post 1496497)
Dude, Atrius overwrote my head0.png. NOT COOL.

D: I know what you mean.

FaLLChiLD 06-03-2009 08:04 AM

SoG shouldn't be on this list (due to "modern"). Graal X should be there instead.

Nice to see SoG has received 0 votes though since it is on the list!

Angel_Light 06-03-2009 04:41 PM

Well this has become a bashing/negative thread about Graal Ghetto

Pelikano 06-03-2009 04:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Angel_Light (Post 1496686)
Well this has become a bashing/negative thread about Graal Ghetto

why can't the graal community take facts

CharlieM 06-03-2009 06:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DustyPorViva (Post 1496497)
Dude, Atrius overwrote my head0.png. NOT COOL.

Yeah, Someone bugged that a while back when they were editting it I will change it right now so that it won't overwrite

DustyPorViva 06-03-2009 06:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CharlieM (Post 1496699)
Yeah, Someone bugged that a while back when they were editting it I will change it right now so that it won't overwrite

If you're using that format for your heads, you'll have to change them all.

Inverness 06-03-2009 06:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CharlieM (Post 1496699)
Yeah, Someone bugged that a while back when they were editting it I will change it right now so that it won't overwrite

Why isn't it simply impossible to overwrite default files?

DustyPorViva 06-03-2009 06:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Inverness (Post 1496711)
Why isn't it simply impossible to overwrite default files?

*sigh* I know.

Pelikano 06-03-2009 07:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Inverness (Post 1496711)
Why isn't it simply impossible to overwrite default files?

Atleast the files should be checked on login..

DustyPorViva 06-03-2009 07:48 PM

Stefan could simply keep a list of default files and not allow any files to be downloaded if they are in the list. However, servers need to start prefixing their files, and I believe that should be one of the things PWA check for when they try to go hosted or something. There really is no excuse for not properly prefixing your files.

fowlplay4 06-03-2009 10:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pelikano (Post 1496688)
why can't the graal community take facts

There's a difference between facts, and outright flaming/****posting. This is an outright ****thread that shouldn't have been started in the first place.


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 02:31 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright (C) 1998-2019 Toonslab All Rights Reserved.