Graal Forums

Graal Forums (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/index.php)
-   PlayerWorlds Main Forum (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=15)
-   -   Debate: Should N-Pulse Remain on the Classic Tab? (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=134259977)

Hiro 07-28-2010 10:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TSAdmin (Post 1590015)
Cats and mousse.

...We are moving onto mentioning two things that are dissimilar in topic now, right? Especially considering that Classic wasn't removed simply because of lack of development, which you obviously have yet to read up on.

Edit: Sign your reps, please. Things such as "You do a bad job of making people in your position seem competent" don't really make sense and I'd love to speak further on how sarcasm != ability to perform my duties competently.

for the record, it wasn't me (:

and as for your sarcasm, i used classic as an example, and i don't wish to discuss classic's personal problems. the point is, classic has reliable development and had a stable playercount, and was removed. n-pulse has a non-stable staff (considering how many managers and other staff they go through), and a playercount made entirely of staff (all 5-7 of them) and still hasn't been removed for months. it's not logical, and i didn't need to read the multiple 20 page thread arguments to understand that point, so your negative rep was actually you not realizing the distinct difference to which i drew conclusions from

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bell (Post 1590047)
As TSA said, the PWA has not even had the time to discuss the fate of NPulse. I will say this though. I do NOT take removal of servers from Classic tab lightly. We're in a difficult situation as it is trying to get quality, reliable development staff without adding more hardships onto a server.

While I don't recall the details of Delteria's removal I do still firmly support the idea of putting it back on tab once they feel they are ready.

Classic was put on UC by mutual agreement between myself and Thor. There was so much drama surrounding Classic that we both felt that by putting it UC he wouldn't have to worry about player support staffing and could focus on development alone. If I didn't feel that Thor would have the stamina to complete the effort I wouldn't of gone that route in the first place. So far its proven to be a good decision.

I've given Npulse some tools they asked for to help jumpstart their newest efforts and reduce some of the tedium. Thats not to say they won't still have a mountain of work to do but its up to them now to see it through. If they feel that going UC will make their life easier then I would move them immediately but unlike Classic they may not have a small core of dedicated staff to help in this and may not want that invisibility.

There was mention that this whole situation doesn't seem fair to UC servers. Why not? These other servers made their qualifications years ago and just because the playercount of Graal overall has dropped considerably they should not be held entirely to blame if they haven't been able to keep up. When people decided to rent and develop these new servers, they knew what they were in for (or should have) and its their turn to battle their way to the top. We encourage those servers along that are making a true effort at making a decent server but not all are even trying. All they want to do is snag some images and scripts from other servers, slap them together to make some minimum qualifications so they get to play manager.

Bottom line, what happens to NPulse isn't up for a public vote. The PWA will encourage them to keep things on track but don't expect any instant results.

well you're just too cool for graal aren't you. we all know you'll do whatever you want, but that won't stop us from debating the topic, so you don't have to sound so coy in your remarks towards our discussion

and if you wanna play the "they made the effort beforehand" the requirements for classic tab now are much more rigorous than they were back when n-pulse was first put on the classic tab. those UC servers are paying a lot of money to get less than half the support than n-pulse receives for the same project, just because they made it to classic tab back in the day where a quest could consist of pulling a block out and killing a baddie

this isn't to say that n-pulse or any other server is entirely to blame for the drop in playercount - we know who's fault that is. but making them go UC seems plausible given the situation of their main server - it obvious by now that they cannot maintain both, so why even give them the option? hell, move them to hosted tab so they can get some more staff to help them get the server back to a playable state: that still gives them an advantage over the common UC server

but again, this isn't up for public vote. do whatever you please, we all know that it won't get them anywhere, and leaving a dead server on the classic list sure isn't helping graal out

Quote:

Originally Posted by ffcmike (Post 1590051)
We decided to remain off the Classic tab with that action initially being taken as an ultimatum by PWA to come up with a definate direction, which it appears Npulse have decided on, we had no intention of maintaining both an up + an Under Construction project which I believe is something Npulse did intend to do, and we haven't released anything playable in the last few months (though something substantial is fairly imminent).

Edit : What Bell said.

and what happens when they cannot seem to maintain that main server? is it really worth keeping their server up just because they asked for it? it could be understandable if they had even 10 active players who were not staff online, but they don't even have that!

and we've at least seen the content you plan to release, while n-pulse has only given us rough percentages. and now that they've gone back to becoming a classic server, they have no answers for how to differentiate themselves from anything UN doesn't already do. their current main server, and any old backup they receive, is essentially a dead UN whose only goal could be to create a schism in UN's playercount

Bell 07-28-2010 10:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hiro (Post 1590078)
well you're just too cool for graal aren't you. we all know you'll do whatever you want, but that won't stop us from debating the topic, so you don't have to sound so coy in your remarks towards our discussion

I spose I need to reconsider the language I'm using on this thread. I never intended to be coy at all and actually thought I was being pretty blunt. I never actually said you couldn't debate it, I just said that the forum public wouldn't be deciding the fate of NPulse.

ffcmike 07-28-2010 11:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hiro (Post 1590078)
and we've at least seen the content you plan to release, while n-pulse has only given us rough percentages. and now that they've gone back to becoming a classic server, they have no answers for how to differentiate themselves from anything UN doesn't already do. their current main server, and any old backup they receive, is essentially a dead UN whose only goal could be to create a schism in UN's playercount

I'm only stating the reasons as to why Classic shouldn't be used as a comparison in this case towards justifying whether or not Npulse should remain on the Classic tab, we took what I, my Co-Manager at the time aswell as the majority of Developers felt was our best course of action and I can only give the benefit of the doubt and assume the same is true of Npulse, and it seems PWA has a similar stance towards them.

Whether or not their plan could succeed however is a different issue, I can't say anything about Npulse's past having barely logged onto it, so no bias here, but I don't feel very encouraged by it's supposed new direction, one parallel it does share with Classic is that bringing back a specific set of old levels will not bring back an old community, and while I would like to see them attempt to base their gameplay on a storyline I believe this is best achieved by designing your server towards the storyline as opposed to trying to mesh it into an existing set of levels and Quests.

kia345 07-28-2010 11:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bell (Post 1590087)
I just said that the forum public wouldn't be deciding the fate of NPulse.

Why do the customers not get input on the servers they are capable of playing?

And in regards to the players with Classic accounts, why do they not get a say in whether the content they paid to access gets removed or not?

The PWA should be eying servers like UN and Zodiac with mediocre development and silly staff circles/constantly rotating management, being quality control and helping nudge the big(ish) playercount servers in the right direction, not picking on heavily developed and anticipated servers.

Fulg0reSama 07-28-2010 11:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kia345 (Post 1590094)
The PWA should be eying servers like UN and Zodiac with mediocre development and silly staff circles/constantly rotating management, being quality control and helping nudge the big(ish) playercount servers in the right direction, not picking on the heavily developed and anticipated servers like NP.

:blush: your so funny.

sssssssssss 07-28-2010 11:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kia345 (Post 1590094)
Why do the customers not get input on the servers they are capable of playing?

And in regards to the players with Classic accounts, why do they not get a say in whether the content they paid to access gets removed or not?

Lol, those questions will NEVER be answered...

Besides, I've been in at least 3 debates where, I believe, pwa's and gdt's lightly said we aren't even customers anymore.

kia345 07-28-2010 11:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sssssssssss (Post 1590097)
we aren't even customers anymore.

Volunteer developers deserve even more input.

Hiro 07-28-2010 11:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bell (Post 1590087)
I spose I need to reconsider the language I'm using on this thread. I never intended to be coy at all and actually thought I was being pretty blunt. I never actually said you couldn't debate it, I just said that the forum public wouldn't be deciding the fate of NPulse.

understandably, i get into this problem a lot (and usually get infractions/-rep for it)

i would like to think that threads like this help towards some level of decision-making by the PWA. i know this isn't true, but at least i can have my dreams ):

after all, it's not like a player with my experience would know anything about graal

Switch 07-29-2010 01:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ffcmike (Post 1590051)
we had no intention of maintaining both an up + an Under Construction project which I believe is something Npulse did intend to do

And thus it's downfall.

sssssssssss 07-29-2010 01:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kia345 (Post 1590098)
Volunteer developers deserve even more input.

Oh I'm not saying even our input should be ignored, it shouldn't whatsoever. Especially on an mmo that relies SO MUCH on its 'customers'.

N-Pulse should not be there anymore. As has been said, requirements have changed, so on the standards used now, they don't make it.

If all you have to do is get it classic then not worry, I'd love to make a server and downgrade it to 3 levels, then say its in the works for quite a few years and try to make it kick ass.

Mark Sir Link 07-29-2010 03:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Clockwork (Post 1590077)
I think it should remain...

Stop being butthurt just because you don't play it. It's not hurting anyone, and if it goes off, who believes it will ever actually make it back? Just let it rot naturally in it's place.


I think the real issue here is if new players logs on and sees it, it could possibly discourage them from checking out other servers that aren't as bad.

Fulg0reSama 07-29-2010 03:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark Sir Link (Post 1590166)
I think the real issue here is if new players logs on and sees it, it could possibly discourage them from checking out other servers that aren't as bad.

It's funny because most new players that come on actually have enjoyed coming on N-Pulse, Only time they've ever been irritated or pissed about something on the server is if someone was abusing at the time.

Other than that most new players that cross by end up being pc id players who just want to hack using an unmentionable program.

Rufus 07-29-2010 03:38 AM

I think the purpose of removing N-Pulse is to make Graal seem a little less like a barren wasteland. Why have a server on our main list that offers little more than broken content?

Hiro 07-29-2010 03:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fulg0reSama (Post 1590167)
It's funny because most new players that come on actually have enjoyed coming on N-Pulse, Only time they've ever been irritated or pissed about something on the server is if someone was abusing at the time.

Other than that most new players that cross by end up being pc id players who just want to hack using an unmentionable program.

1 out of 20 doesn't qualify the word "most"

and what a great mention - you're server is being used to test trainers!

Fulg0reSama 07-29-2010 03:53 AM

I don't mean to derail.. But I'm curious.. and this is only because I want to know how come N-Pulse is in desire need of deletion when you've got valikorlia sitting pretty with even less than us. I mean sure make target of N-Pulse if you don't like it, But at least tell me why. N-Pulse needs to be ahead in line for deletion rather than Valikorlia?


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 03:52 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright (C) 1998-2019 Toonslab All Rights Reserved.