| cbk1994 |
10-31-2009 02:23 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scouser
(Post 1535193)
gl with that 0.0, cept this was taken at 5PM So...
|
Let's take a look at the login logs (I've included the EST time in bold).
Quote:
Originally Posted by logs/login.txt
Time: Thu Oct 29 11:21:54 2009 -- Thursday @ 9:00 AM
Scouser (Graal721576) is logged on
Time: Thu Oct 29 08:42:44 2009 -- Thursday @ 6:00 AM
Scouser (Graal721576) is logged on
Time: Wed Oct 28 14:16:01 2009 -- Wednesday @ 12:00 PM
Scouser (Graal721576) is logged on
Time: Wed Oct 28 11:40:57 2009 -- Wednesday @ 9:00 AM
Scouser (Graal721576) is logged on
Time: Wed Oct 28 11:18:49 2009 -- Wednesday @ 9:00 AM
Scouser (Graal721576) is logged on
Time: Wed Oct 28 08:55:10 2009 -- Wednesday @ 6:00 AM
Scouser (Graal721576) is logged on
Time: Wed Oct 28 06:10:52 2009 -- Wednesday @ 4:00 AM
Scouser (Graal721576) is logged on
Time: Wed Oct 28 04:58:02 2009 -- Wednesday @ 2:00 AM
Scouser (Graal721576) is logged on
Time: Tue Oct 27 11:17:51 2009 -- Tuesday @ 9:00 AM
Scouser (Graal721576) is logged on
|
You posted this thread on Thursday at about 1:00 PM, while according to the clock in the screenshot it was 6:26 AM (you can find this by looking at how much the clock is off from current time for you).
Unless you took this picture a long time ago, the only plausible time you would have logged on and stayed until 5 PM might have been this:
Quote:
Originally Posted by logs/login.txt
Time: Wed Oct 28 14:16:01 2009 -- Wednesday @ 12:00 PM
|
And I doubt you stayed on for five hours without reconnecting once.
Which makes me think you had logged on at
Quote:
Originally Posted by logs/login.txt
Time: Thu Oct 29 08:42:44 2009 -- Thursday @ 6:00 AM
|
which effectively proves 6:00 AM, not 5 PM EST.
Feel free to have another staff check that I'm not spoofing the logs. |
