^^

How did I manage that exclusive list I wonder. Thanks lol.

Oh, come on. 'bull' is a euphamism for the word you refer to.

I don't see the problem with her using bull.

To me that's like saying dumb instead of dumb***.

(turns out *** isn't even censored)

Even if I just made no sense, I don't see how skipping the obcene part of a word is bad.
bull**** isn't censored, just ****

No, I meant to say BULL , nothing else...anyway, I'm not going to argue with you, lol

So could you please unlock this thread?
http://forums.graalonline.com/forums...ad.php?t=56899
;)

No, there are perfectly valid reasons for those rules to be there, and they aren't going anywhere...these rules, however need to be changed because of the changes to the forums, one has nothing to do with the other...and I'm not discussing it any further in this thread.

1) You haven't even bothered to explain why.
2) Even if you disagree, why is a discussion illegal?
3) You might be a super moderator, but you are not the top-ranked staff member over the forums.
4) Ignoring me (and the rest) does nothing but helping my point to be proven.

On a bit of a side note, does anyone know how to make it show more depth using hybrid mode?

I hate that "More replies below current depth..."
I want to see a tree of EVERYTHING :cool:

Update: Borgie is now included in 'the rebels'

Have the oppressors decided on adding/deleting a rule yet?

No, and they never would as long as there is logic involved.

I know. :(

Behold the lack of logic:

Spell out PM and ask again.

Not rediculouser than that sentence.

That is clearly because you are biased.

Or perhaps because those with use the hybrid mode are also more likely to evade the wrath of the mods.

You, obviously, cannot.

It is the only one that is likely to be changed.

Hybrid :)

In case you missed it, Moon Goddess stated that the supermods will be discussing the addition of such a rule. No more spam, please.

The problem is that only one supermod decides which rule would be discussed.

Uh, no? Any supermod (or heck, even a normal mod) can bring up some forum policy for discussion. You just don't see it because that kinda stuff takes place in private forums.

The main problem is that my perfectly good thread was closed because ONE of the supermods disagreed with my rule suggestions.
Discussion of rules is not illegal according to the forum rules, and no bashing was involved so :\

Making a spelling error in the same post you criticize someone else's spelling is not a tactful thing to do.

What is this linear/hybrid you speak of?!

User CP -> Edit Options -> Thread Display Options -> Thread Display Mode -> x

Making a revolt is not tactful either.

It's more tactful though.

Ok, this thread has gone on long enough, you have had your say, and it has been noted...as I said in this thread, us supermods will discuss the rules, and make changes where it is warranted.
Closed....