lol hmmm that's interesting.

Whether it is justified or not or even valid for that matter , if Stefan and Stephane deem it what they want your point is moot. Bluntly right or wrong it is their game. and if you want to play it then you have to accept the terms as they lay them out or move on to something else. No one is going to force you to play or stay but to stay means acceptance of the rules.

Unfortunately not all PWA make wise decisions.
One PWA assumed that nextpage.wav is a G2K2 only sound and I was tol to remove it from a NPC I had made. :/
I forgot to ask that here, but I think someone told me it was allowed to be used.

I agree we will make mistakes at times , I don't know who told you this or the validity of you can or cannot use it. I for one don't know and I don't ask things to be removed unless I know for sure. If you think one of us is making a mistake about something (me included) by all means contact Spark and discuss it with him. We are here to help as well as enforce things and I don't have a problem with someone who questions what I tell them, normally before I do I am 95% sure what I am telling them is accurate information. But there is always that 5% I could be wrong. If I am really not that sure on something I will tell someone I will look into it and take no action on it till I am sure.

Sigh. Predictably, you yet again missed the point. I was indicating that just because they approve rules does not mean that the rules are in the best interests of the game. Just because they listen to your ideas and approve your rules does not make them correct. They are not infallible, as you seem to want us to believe.

Demonstrate the relevance of this to your argument, please. Otherwise, this statement merely serves to support my point.

But they can be debated, modified, or improved. They are not locked in stone. You will note that Spark has already modified some of the rules. Some of my suggestions were even put into place in their initial assembly.

Incorrect. To stay means that I agree to abide by them, not that I agree to accept them. There is a difference, though I don't expect you to understand that.

RC 4
 

I think everyone INCLUDING manager/Owner should have level 3....Theres no use for Changing Staff Accounts right.Unless your a global

Re: RC 4
 

I guess you haven't been around long enough to know what that right was used for. It is a useless right and only used on accounts like Admin-Playerworld , at one time there were Staff accounts and players did not as they do today use their personal accounts for Staff and what that right was for.

Example:
Enigma_GP1

All of those accounts are currently disabled so that right is pretty much useless.

Lance don’t bother replying to any of my post because I will ignore your attacks on me with your jackass posts. Nor will I ever bother to answer any insignificant point you may try to make. When you grow up and try posting something constructive for a change I may but that is doubtful you ever will. Spark doesn't change anything on his own without discussing it with the rest of us because unlike you he values mature opinions on things.:rolleyes:

Re: Re: RC 4
 

Havent been playing that long..only 5 years

Congratulations - you've only managed to further evade my points. Unfortunately, I fully intend on replying to your points, as I won't let you get off that easy.

If they are so insignificant, why have they riled you up so much...?

But I'm more mature than you, despite being thirty years younger...?

I never said he did change anything without discussing it...? Man, you really need to start reading (and perhaps even listening to) what I say. It'd do wonders for your intelligence, and might even annihilate your holier-than-thou ignore-others'-points attitude.

*ignore* Sorry it's all I could muster to be bothered with, I have better things to do with my time (important things) that concerns Graal besides your post. :p

Here, you can borrow mine... I just had it washed!

I think the rule should be changed again to only Owner and Manager may have level 4 RC.

Giving up is not usually considered a viable way to win a debate.

Whatever, though. You're merely continuing your tendency to run away from debates when losing, so I suppose I shouldn't have expected better from you (even considering your extra thirty years of supposed wisdom - or would you profess that it is something you learn as you grow older to give up when you have lost? Ordinarily, though, people admit defeat when giving up. But, I digress). Good day. :)

I am not trying to win anything with you at all nor did I post anything directly to you so there is no debate between us only what your misconceptions perceives to be. I just love an adolescent 18 year old who thinks they know it all and can't learn anything because of it. It's typical and you are not unique in that nor is the punch line of an old joke that says" You know the older I get the smarter my Father gets."

Anyone who publicly has to profess their maturity is lacking in it or they wouldn't feel the need to reassure themselves of it by trying to gain support from the masses by expressing it. Sorry just saying it's so doesn't make it that way. People with wisdom and maturity don't go around boasting of it, it's only the insecure arrogant loud mouths that feel the need to feel superior because of their own insecurities of their personality. We all have flaws; you just seem to be more flamboyant about yours than most do on here.

Good Day :grin:

You haven't posted anything directly to me...? Are your literacy skills failing you in your old age? Read this very thread, foolish one.

And I love an adolescent 50 year old who thinks they know it all just because they're older.

:)

Hmm, and how old are your kids? They must not be more than babes, for all you've shown us.

Wait, I'm confused. You professed your maturity first and made me out to be immature because of my age. I responded by explaining that there are several adults who are immature (you being one of them) and several young adults who are mature (implying that I am a member of such).

So, by your (flawed) logic, we're both immature, which by your other statements simply cannot be the case. You should really examine the implications of your statements before you make them, else you will stumble headfirst into adversity. You have done so here.

Hy

po

crite.

Why, thank you. :)

Seems to be the other way around for my dad
:p

Might I say that you're getting REALLY paranoid and strict with the RCs =x
It's only a problem when stupid people are like "Oh, you're my friend! Here, have a level4, you have a brother? Yeah he can have a level4 too =D". If there is a reason for someone to have a right, then there isn't a reason that they shouldn't have it. I don't have trouble giving more rights/responsibility to someone who does good and enough work, but then again I keep a short staff listing =x
Anyway, I just think we're getting WAY out of hand with this, and if you are not going to enforce, why bother =x
-Shifter

I think not, we know best what happens with loose rcs dont we ps.

I mean ffs, you wont even give me NC on shifter anymore.

I agree :O, if there is a reason they should have it and they can handle it (-and there is a certain degree of trust) then they should have it. These new rules are getting in the way of my job and its pissing me off :mad:

~Inverness

All the love for mg, but man lance you rock so hard :)

I do try. :)

yah :cool:

Well, you might need it some day...even though ive never used it on my server

I don't want to get into the poo-slinging, but that is some funny stuff. :p

Check

Dates

Of

Posts

Before

You

Perform

Thread

Necromancy!

Oh, wow! Such ownage.

I'm glad I didn't revive it.

I'm glad I can end it :)