Graal Forums

Graal Forums (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/index.php)
-   Graal Main Forum (English) (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   Graal ported to the Dreamcast? (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=38113)

Googi 09-20-2002 04:53 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by gokux33
I own every version released in America, including an imported Green version.
Why? All the battling you need can be found on online simulators.

LiL_NightFall 09-20-2002 05:12 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Googi


Why? All the battling you need can be found on online simulators.

I find that Pokemon sucks either way. It was fun the first time. Ok the second time. The third time was ridiculous. They don't add anything new to it. My advice: Find a new game. :cool:

Excalibur 09-20-2002 10:25 AM

i was thinkin about graal online game ports and stuff a few days ago actually. Xbox, ps2, the newer systems are all connecting the trend of online gaming. If you could modify the game pad, and stuff you could release a version of graal to play off xbox or ps2 or whatever. You could probably make some cash off that, also. If newer graal versions (2k2 2k1 you know) were made for the systems, and you made enough cash of that, mabe you could make the classic servers free again? (just had to say it) Anyways, i hear talk about graal gameboy. that sounded like a good idea.

jeff335 09-20-2002 09:22 PM

Personally I think that the Mac port should be the highest porting priority. There are many people who use macs and would not consider buying a PC.

As far as consoles go, I've never owned one and never will, and don't really understand them, but xbox would appear to show some potential for graal, though nothing lacking keyboard and mouse would be fully compatible with Windows graal.

MalakSylv 09-20-2002 10:12 PM

1) Lil_Nightfall: "Original" monsters aren't bomies. Original means it's new, and not done before.

2) Graal wouldn't be ported to offline only consoles. It would defeat the whole purpose.

Judge_Spunky 09-21-2002 09:45 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by MalakSylv
2) Graal wouldn't be ported to offline only consoles. It would defeat the whole purpose.
Exactly. It's the community (mainly) that makes Graal, not the design.

Also, porting Graal on to an offline-only console would be like having CounterStrike on the Super Nintendo.
Obviously the system couldn't support the game, but the point is that it would be a dull and flat game on that kind of system.

Ever-free 09-21-2002 10:09 AM

Porting to BeOS? What a waste of time. Hardly anyone uses it. ;[

vovavziggy 09-21-2002 04:21 PM

umm, Dreamcast is an online console.

Judge_Spunky 09-22-2002 12:13 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by vovavziggy
umm, Dreamcast is an online console.
We all know that, but the Dreamcast isn't having anything made for it. In other words, it's discontinued. Why design something for a product that you are perfectly aware of that is discontinued?

Excalibur 09-22-2002 06:09 AM

their are mod chips for ps and ps2 that allow one to play back up copies of games on the ps systems. If you could create something that could be burned to cd, then played on a dreamcast council then it could work? I heard you can play burned games on dream cast without a mod chip.

Xbob41 09-22-2002 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Judge_Spunky


We all know that, but the Dreamcast isn't having anything made for it. In other words, it's discontinued. Why design something for a product that you are perfectly aware of that is discontinued?

Aside from Treasure's latest and greatest masterpiece Ikaruga, there are games being made for it, albeit, they're all dating sims and the sort :/

PS PLAY IKARUGA NOW :O


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 07:38 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright (C) 1998-2019 Toonslab All Rights Reserved.