![]() |
I'm not sure I get your point. I never said I wanted tyhm's version back (though many other might).
Quote:
Quote:
in all seriousness, your server is fine, some people may even like its style better, but it's a different entity. what I may want doesn't have to come as a contradiction to what you want. It's like saying, how could you still like Zelda a Link to the Past when Twilight Princess is already out!! regarding the present tense - if it bothers people so much, the moderators can change it, i don't care. but people can still play the quests in other means, the levels are still available, they haven't been wiped from existence. |
Quote:
Quote:
I know I've been a critic of the iPhone server's reminiscence or lack thereof, but at least my personal definitions are consistent. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Much of the sentiment behind the 2000 version of Classic is based on the circumstances of its day, that it was free to play, there were hundreds of players, the sheer quantity of content, there were few other Graal servers, it was more possible to submit your own content to the game etc. If it were to somehow be brought back, it would be very clear that much of it is terribly out-dated, low standard, poorly designed (which Tyhm thought so a decade ago), and to scripters - difficult to maintain and add improvements to. |
Quote:
as if I just wanted the restoration of the levels from a random version, or tyhm's version. Quote:
should I treat everything as black as white to maintain consistency? in 2003 some of these quests were still around. in 2011 I none of these quests are still around. should I treat both versions the same just because they were different from before? Quote:
but just because you have something of your own, doesn't mean that the opinions of people that want something else, that doesn't have to come in the place of your thing, have to be hushed. this argument doesn't concern you or your server personally. Quote:
tyhm didn't do his overhaul because people disliked what was before, but because he wasn't able to fully develop his own vision on it. To say that people only played it because there weren't many options, or because it was free, is just untrue in my opinion. |
By the way:
I'm a pretty nice and friendly fellow, I'm not here to annoy you or make you nuisance as you say. but if it were my cause, you could have said that I had succeeded - the best way to defeat an internet troll is to ignore him. I'll be glad to see more people participate in the poll and the original topic. |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
As far as concerning the server, how could "reupload the 2000 Classic levels" not be? (albeit Graal2000 was a flop, and was made in the first place to prove Tyhm's point) Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
i just want to say that I am not. Quote:
Graal1998 and Graal2000 were almost designed in a way that would make them flop, maybe because tyhm wanted to prove his point. graal1998 was a too-early version and had in-game cheat codes that messed gameplay. the server changed to Graal2000 mostly after most people already left and the controls were handed to a bunch of silly new guys who started changing it in a completely unrelated direction (they even wanted to add jobs) a real graal2000 that continues development could have been successful. Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
You made a post pertaining to old Classic content in the present tense, with full knowledge they no longer exist (in Zol's Toilet's case, in its original form), then inconspicuously questioned whether this is true. It shouldn't come across as a surprise at all that I am questioning the validity of this thread, personal or not. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT +2. The time now is 08:38 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright (C) 1998-2019 Toonslab All Rights Reserved.