Graal Forums
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Graal Forums (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/index.php)
-   Era Main Forum (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=162)
-   -   Any chance... (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=134260170)

cbk1994 08-15-2010 08:58 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by KrimsonSky (Post 1594282)
But players can't run stuff remember, all bout them NPCs, gg.
You seem to be contradicting yourself ...?

KrimsonSky 08-15-2010 11:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by cbk1994 (Post 1594285)
You seem to be contradicting yourself ...?
/sarcasm

run41 08-16-2010 04:04 AM
Krims right.
Btw, im almost back dude!
Iloveyouboyfrieeend <3

jkldogg 08-16-2010 05:55 AM
So what had happened was.......
killaz (ya i kno we own) and like 6 other parties allied up and took over BH for like 20 minutes so Frankie cried and took off party allying cuz he said something like

"wow this is stupid, whoever made party allying is retared. parties shouldn't be able to overrun gang bases."

???
Why don't you make the gangs better or stronger in some way? Not my fault they get owned. o.o

EDIT: Krim sell me your Purple Noland on Era like 15k?

Frankie 08-16-2010 07:05 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jkldogg (Post 1594411)
So what had happened was.......
killaz (ya i kno we own) and like 6 other parties allied up and took over BH for like 20 minutes so Frankie cried and took off party allying cuz he said something like

"wow this is stupid, whoever made party allying is retared. parties shouldn't be able to overrun gang bases."

???
Why don't you make the gangs better or stronger in some way? Not my fault they get owned. o.o

EDIT: Krim sell me your Purple Noland on Era like 15k?
okay, so if I could go back in time, I would have totally just made people in gangs to 3 times the damage to people in parties. there, problem solved. I'm sure you would have been a happy camper. shut up.

cbk1994 08-16-2010 07:15 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frankie (Post 1594427)
okay, so if I could go back in time, I would have totally just made people in gangs to 3 times the damage to people in parties. there, problem solved. I'm sure you would have been a happy camper. shut up.
you'd probably still get owned
ctrl v

maximus_asinus 08-16-2010 07:25 AM
Why not remove gangs and expand the party system, it sounds like it would have more potential. Build parties like a guild/gang. Allow players to partner up, and if their party reaches a certain threshold it becomes a gang (activity, party size, etc) and have it lose gang status once it starts to fail requirements. Parties can absorb other parties if the leader of the other party accepts. You cannot be in a party if you're already in a party already (to keep from multiguilding).

Fulg0reSama 08-16-2010 07:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by maximus_asinus (Post 1594432)
Why not remove gangs and expand the party system, it sounds like it would have more potential. Build parties like a guild/gang. Allow players to partner up, and if their party reaches a certain threshold it becomes a gang (activity, party size, etc) and have it lose gang status once it starts to fail requirements. Parties can absorb other parties if the leader of the other party accepts. You cannot be in a party if you're already in a party already (to keep from multiguilding).
I support this idea.

jkldogg 08-16-2010 08:23 AM
@ max sales was gonna do that...when he resigned the idea died
@ frankie.....QQ more? umad

ya i support ur idea max

xTcDiabloxTc 08-16-2010 09:01 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by maximus_asinus (Post 1594432)
Why not remove gangs and expand the party system, it sounds like it would have more potential. Build parties like a guild/gang. Allow players to partner up, and if their party reaches a certain threshold it becomes a gang (activity, party size, etc) and have it lose gang status once it starts to fail requirements. Parties can absorb other parties if the leader of the other party accepts. You cannot be in a party if you're already in a party already (to keep from multiguilding).
Similar Idea to what I've been working on. Would post full details but I'd rather work out the kinks first. And of course, I don't like being quoted on it when things can still change :).

jkldogg 08-16-2010 09:03 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by xTcDiabloxTc (Post 1594467)
Similar Idea to what I've been working on. Would post full details but I'd rather work out the kinks first. And of course, I don't like being quoted on it when things can still change :).
no secrets :[

xTcDiabloxTc 08-16-2010 09:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jkldogg (Post 1594469)
no secrets :[
I'm not trying to keep secrets, It'll be unveiled when it's ready for the public eye. I'd prefer to make an announcement when I have it all prepared.

Frankie 08-16-2010 09:45 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by jkldogg (Post 1594436)
@ frankie.....QQ more? umad
you're the one *****ing about it bro.

Venom_Fish 08-16-2010 05:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by xTcDiabloxTc (Post 1594467)
Similar Idea to what I've been working on. Would post full details but I'd rather work out the kinks first. And of course, I don't like being quoted on it when things can still change :).
Thats very original of you. You're a creative fellow, no one ever thought of that =o!

KrimsonSky 08-16-2010 06:13 PM
Hmm,

Reset the gangs,
Expand the party system's capabilities,
Let rich people purchase gangs.

but i know, LAT's will actually have to make more bases.../shocked this would be a nightmare ,
even though I'd offer to make bases in my sleep.


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 08:29 AM.
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright (C) 1998-2019 Toonslab All Rights Reserved.