Graal Forums

Graal Forums (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/index.php)
-   Classic Main Forum (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=175)
-   -   Bring back Classic levels and hit detection? (https://forums.graalonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=85415)

contego 05-06-2009 05:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackSolider (Post 1489647)
I'll give a quick, sarcastic summary:

Old classic players: Look at the polls! Listen to the people! Clearly this would solve so many problems! I miss old classic and this would bring back a ton of old players!

Current classic players: It would take a massive amount of manpower (which we don't really have,) not to mention it'd take months to complete (if not more than a year.) Meanwhile, nothing would be added to classic and thus the server would probably die before it was complete.

That about sums it up.

:noob:

Basically this post was meant to mock us, nothing more. Also, the poll is not all oldbies. The fact remains, this is Classic and should stay as such. Your post is nothing more than a little outburst, and has no relevent argument. It's clear where the development is needed on Classic.

unknown 05-06-2009 05:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xnervNATx (Post 1489667)
im scared oh yeah.




where did i write the name contego in my post , and lol i dont give a crap about his global staff exp. Also i dont give a fk about when you or he started graal . :P

between me and you id like to know who is caring the most for classic, if i read all your post its all about words and words , yet you did nothing to help classic :P


Not saying you should be scared lol, you're a waste of my time on the internet, why do you think I would waste time on you IRL?

I really think you're not even old enough to play graal or post on here since you can't understand simple analogies, be relevant, or even simply communicate with others.

Where did you write contego? Hmm, I don't know, you only QUOTED HIM. Did your mom drop you? I mean, besides on the doorstep of someone else? Or maybe she killed 2 birds with 1 stone.

You care for classic so much? You're a FAQ......a position that is unneeded in current classic days. Please let me know what you've done for GRAAL in general? You surely didn't pay for your account which is the root of support. You surely haven't given any good input on this post or anything relevant.

You lack logic in every department, I am amazed you know how to even use a computer, or even walk and talk for that matter.

Rufus 05-06-2009 05:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by contego (Post 1489669)
no relevent argument

The way you are constantly throwing this around makes me believe you're not really sure what "relevance" is.

unknown 05-06-2009 05:24 PM

Not one person has had a valid argument against ours, except for the fact that it would be HARD to make changes. Please, don't bother posting until you kids have something RELEVANT to say.

Zeltino 05-06-2009 05:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xnervNATx (Post 1489667)
where did i write the name contego in my post , (insert idiotic remarks...blah blah blah...) :P

Quote:

Originally Posted by xnervNATx;
Quote:

Originally Posted by contego;
Right Bell, but in all fairness are they really managing atm?

You're also right that you get to hear the compliants, but it's all part of the package deal and tbh I believe you're one who can help get this job done.

say what.

she already tryed to ditch us with the review , tbh i dont think she can help no more.'

edit: im already glad to hear that thym will bring the best quest ever made

You quoted him you idiot. I'm pretty sure that's in your post. Or maybe I'm blind :confused: :confused:

unknown 05-06-2009 05:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rufus (Post 1489673)
The way you are constantly throwing this around makes me believe you're not really sure what "relevance" is.

heres that little mosquito again....and what have you contributed to this post other than negative remarks? If you voted on the poll, I'm POSITIVE you voted on the same thing the majority did, so stop being such a try hard.

contego 05-06-2009 05:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xnervNATx (Post 1489667)
im scared oh yeah.



where did i write the name contego in my post , and lol i dont give a crap about his global staff exp. Also i dont give a fk about when you or he started graal . :P

between me and you id like to know who is caring the most for classic, if i read all your post its all about words and words , yet you did nothing to help classic :P

For starters, you quoted me and tried to say "this is coming from someone who never played classic."

Secondly, we're really actually trying to help. One is this poll. Two is that I offered MASTER STORM for me to help out on what I know how to do. I have a real life job and make real life money. I enjoy playing Graal, but I will put my money where my mouth is and help too. I know how to find talent. I can put a team together, I listen, and I prioritize needs.

The last thing I want to do is return working on Graal for Free. They've already milked enough out of me in that department. However I'm also willing to roll up my sleeves and get my hands dirty too.

Zeltino 05-06-2009 05:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rufus (Post 1489673)
the way you are constantly throwing this around makes me believe you're not really sure what "relevance" is.

negative nancy

unknown 05-06-2009 05:30 PM

Hey contego, just remember that if you have any questions, you can ask Debbie Downer, I mean Laura, shes a FAQ!

xnervNATx 05-06-2009 05:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by unknown (Post 1489670)
Not saying you should be scared lol, you're (Insert useless wall of text here)..

yea

Rufus 05-06-2009 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by unknown (Post 1489674)
Not one person has had a valid argument against ours, except for the fact that it would be HARD to make changes. Please, don't bother posting until you kids have something RELEVANT to say.

I'm pretty sure there has been several "valid arguments" against the opening post, but I suppose you're just going by what you see as a "valid" reason for not doing what you're saying. That must be one hell of a requirement huh.

Quote:

Originally Posted by unknown (Post 1489676)
heres that little mosquito again....and what have you contributed to this post other than negative remarks?

Negative Remarks != Critical Input?

Quote:

Originally Posted by unknown (Post 1489676)
If you voted on the poll, I'm POSITIVE you voted on the same thing the majority did, so stop being such a try hard.

I didn't vote in the poll because it is too limited and I don't vote for things just for the sake of getting something new. Trying so hard.

unknown 05-06-2009 05:32 PM

lol laura, come on now, you can do better than that.

your insults are repetitive and not even good.

unknown 05-06-2009 05:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rufus (Post 1489682)
I'm pretty sure there has been several "valid arguments" against the opening post, but I suppose you're just going by what you see as a "valid" reason for not doing what you're saying. That must be one hell of a requirement huh.

Quote:

Originally Posted by unknown (Post 1489676)
heres that little mosquito again....and what have you contributed to this post other than negative remarks?

Negative Remarks != Critical Input



I didn't vote in the poll because it is too limited and I don't vote for things just for the sake of getting something new. Trying so hard.

Too Limited my @$$. Nice excuse. Negative remarks aren't critical input, Constructive Criticism is.

Thanks for your unwanted input Dufus and Debbie Downer. Sorry but I haven't seen anything good come out of either of you, you both just instigate.

contego 05-06-2009 05:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rufus (Post 1489673)
The way you are constantly throwing this around makes me believe you're not really sure what "relevance" is.

Not relevent to the thread, and tbh neither is about half of what unknown and nervNAT has said.

rel·e·vant

a: having significant and demonstrable bearing on the matter at hand

b: affording evidence tending to prove or disprove the matter at issue or under discussion <relevant testimony>

c: having social relevance

It's becoming a bickering battle rather than working to make a positive change with Classic. It's clear we're all passionate about Classic, so let's focus the energy in the right direction.

Again we all agree the HD is the primary issue.

Let's start there.

unknown 05-06-2009 05:46 PM

I agree with contego, I am sick of going back and forth with you 2. It's like you like bickering with us. Please, for the sake of classic, post something that actually has something to really do with this thread.


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 08:50 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright (C) 1998-2019 Toonslab All Rights Reserved.